THE INNOVATION PARADOX IN THE SERBIAN ECONOMY: THE GRANGER CAUSALITY APPROACH

Authors

  • Lidija Madžar Alfa BK University, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Auditing, Belgrade, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE2237009M

Keywords:

Serbia, innovations, patent applications, gross domestic product (GDP), gross expenditures for research and development (GERD), vector autoregressive (VAR) model, Granger causality test, innovation paradox, business environment

Abstract

Innovations, as the applications of new ideas, solutions and technological practices that improve goods, services and business processes, are the most important driver of economic progress. They lead to greater productivity and efficiency, and therefore to better economic results. The purpose of this article is to examine the state, interrelation and the impact of innovative activities on the economic growth of Serbia. The paper first uses standard multiple regression and concludes that in the period from 2004 to 2020, the number of registered patents did not contribute, while the gross expenditures for research and development (GERD) contributed positively and significantly to the growth of the Serbian GDP. Therefore, it can be said that Serbia is facing a kind of innovation paradox, since the growth of allocations coexists with a dramatic decrease in the number of registered patents. Its second part is based on the construction of the corresponding Vector autoregressive VAR(1) model that traces the causal relationship between GERD and the economic growth of Serbia in the period from 1997 to 2020. It follows that while GERD does not cause GDP in the Granger sense, the GDP causes GERD allocations for innovative activities in Serbia. The scientific research work in Serbia is not efficient and effective enough because it draws funds from the GDP, but does not meet expectations and does not produce tangible results, especially in the expected number of registered patents. Therefore, it is necessary to build an appropriate incentive environment that would stimulate more adequately and value new innovative ventures.

References

Blach, J. (2011). Financial innovations and their role in the modern financial systemidentification and systematization of the problem. e-Finanse: Financial Internet Quarterly, 7(3), 13-26.

Block, T. H. (2002). Financial Systems, Innovation and Economic Performance. Maastricht, Netherlands: MERIT and International Institute of Infonomics.

Borojević, K. (2006). Knowledge based innovations in modern entrepreneurship. Acta Economica, 4(4), 221-246. Retrieved from: http://www.ae.ef.unibl.org/index.php/ae/article/view/285

Deutsche Zusammenarbeit, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC, & Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit. (2020). Srbija 2030 Razvojni prioriteti: Izveštaj nedržavnog sektora. Belgrade, Serbia: Deutsche Zusammenarbeit, SDC, & GIZ.

Digital Community. (2021). Poreski podsticaji za novoosnovana inovaciona privredna društva, Belgrade, Serbia: DC. Retrieved from: https://www.digitalnazajednica.org/2021/07/01/poreske-olaksice-za-novoosnovana-inovaciona-privrednadrustva/

Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation?. 13th ed. Cornell SC Johnson College of Business, Geneva, Switzerland: INSEAD & WIPO. Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf

European Central Bank. (2017). How does innovation lead to growth? Frankfurt, Germany: ECB. Retrieved from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/explainers/tell-memore/html/growth.en.html

Eurostat. (2022a). GDP and main components. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/NAMA_10_GDP__custom_1844550/default/ table?lang=en

Eurostat. (2022b). Patent applications to the European Patent Office (source: EPO). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/sdg_09_40_ esmsip2.htm

Eurostat. (2022c). Research and development (R&D). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/rd_esms.htm

Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B., & Srholec, M. (2010). Innovation and Economic Development. In: Hall. B., & Rosenberg. N. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1-62. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266265812_Innovation_and_Economic_Development

Galindo, M. A., & Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67(5), 825-829. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.052

Granger, C. W. J. (1980). Testing for causality: A personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329–352. DOI:10.1016%2F0165- 1889%2880%2990069-X

Fayomi, O. S. I., Adelakun, J. O., & Babaremu, K. O. (2019). The Impact of Technological Innovation on Production. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1378 022014, 1-9. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1378/2/022014

Hashi, I., & Stojičić, N. (2013). Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation Activities, and Competitiveness of Industries in EU Member and Candidate Countries. Economic Annals, 58(198), 7-34. DOI: 10.2298/EKA1398007H

Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55(2), 163–172.

Jovičić, Ž. (2009). Investing into Scientific Research and Economic Growth. Acta Economica, 7(10), 355-371. Retrieved from: http://www.ae.ef.unibl.org/index.php/ae/article/view/239/239

Kutlača, Đ., Stefanović Šestić, S., Jelić. S., & Popović Pantić, S. (2020). The Impact of investment in Research and Development on the Economic Growth in Serbia. Industrija, 48(1), 23-46. DOI: 10.5937/industrija48-24949

Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Chatterjee, D. (2017). Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1(2017), January 10. DOI: 10.1186/s13731-016-0061-9

Maradana, R. P., Pradhan, R. P., Dash, S., Zaki, D. B., Gaurav, K., Jayakumar, M., & Sarangi, A. K. (2019). Innovation and economic growth in European Economic Area countries: The Granger causality approach. IIMB Management Review, 31(3), 268-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.002

Milutinović, J. (2016). Inovatorima u Srbiji neisplativa registracija patenata. Al Jazeera, November 28, 2016. Retrieved from: https://balkans.aljazeera.net/news/balkan/2016/11/28/inovatorima-u-srbiji-neisplativa-registracija-patenata

Mitrović, V., & Mitrović, I. (2020). Politika inovacija poslovnih subjekata u industriji kao faktor održivog razvoja u tranzicionom okruženju. Ekonomski signali, 15(2), 31-47. DOI: 10.5937/ekonsig2002031M

National Alliance for Local Development. (2021). Analiza stanja inovacija i procesa digitalne transformacije u Republici Srbiji. Belgrade, Serbia: Philip Morris Operations AD Niš, The Government of the Republic of Serbia & NALED.

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development. (2020). Izveštaj o stanju u nauci u 2019. godini, sa predlozima i sugestijama za narednu godinu. Belgrade, Serbia: NCSTD.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Innovation and Growth: Rationale for an Innovation Strategy. Paris, France: OECD.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Frascati Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. Paris, France: OECD.

Pece, A. M., Oros, S. O. E., & Salisteanu, F. (2015). Innovation and economic growth: An empirical analysis for CEE countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26 (2015), 461-467. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00874-6

Rosenberg, N. (2004). Innovation and Economic Growth. Paris, France: OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/industry/tourism/34267902.pdf

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development – An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. New Brunswick & London, UK: Transaction Publishers.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. 1st ed. London, UK & New York, US: Routledge.

Shrestha, M. B., & Bhatta, G. R. (2018). Selecting appropriate methodological framework for time series data analysis. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 4(2018), 71-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfds.2017.11.001

Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320.

Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. (2021). Indikatori inovativnih aktivnosti, 2018-2020. Belgrade, Serbia: SORS. Retrieved from: https://www.stat.gov.rs/srlatn/vesti/20211203-indikatori-inovativnih-aktivnosti-2018-2020/

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed., Boston, US: Pearson.

The World Bank. (2010). Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, D.C., US: The World Bank.

The World Bank. (2022). Research and Development Expediture (% of GDP) – Serbia. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?locations=RS

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2022). Statistical Country Profiles: Serbia. Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/profile.jsp?code=RS

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Papers

How to Cite

THE INNOVATION PARADOX IN THE SERBIAN ECONOMY: THE GRANGER CAUSALITY APPROACH . (2022). Acta Economica, 20(37), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE2237009M

Similar Articles

1-10 of 329

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>