ECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE1931107S

Keywords:

income inequality, poverty, Gini coefficient, risk of poverty, European Union

Abstract

Excessive accumulation and raising income inequality reflected on the high rates of poverty in the European Union countries. Economic literature has wide research on the link between income inequality and economic growth. However, knowledge about correlation between income inequality and poverty is scare. In this paper, we have proved that poverty is not synonymous for income inequality, but that is a product of income inequality. Income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, reflected the movement of the percentage of the population who are at risk of poverty. The coefficient of simple on correlation showed that income inequality affects the growth risk of poverty in the countries of the European Union. Besides poverty, as a consequence of income inequality, other socio-economic problems also appeared: the suppression of economic growth, the rise in crime rate, the decline in the quality of education and health, the political inequality growth. All these problems should warn governments to take economic policy for reducing economic inequality. The European Union, as an area of 28 member states, needs to carefully select economic policy instruments to reduce income inequality and ensure stable ground for economic growth. The differences between the level of development, the index of democracy, income and living standards in observed countries have influenced the difficulty in observing the problem and computing mathematical and statistical connection. Through equalization of incomes, the European Union could solve problems of poverty, social exclusion and democracy (measured by index of democracy).

References

Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (Eds.). (2018). World inequality report 2018. Belknap Press. doi.org/10.3386/w23119

Aristondo, O. (2018). Poverty decomposition in incidence, intensity and inequality. A review. Hacienda Pública Española, 225(2), 109-130. doi.org/10.7866/hpe-rpe.18.2.4

Begović, B. (2015). O ekonomskoj nejednakosti i društvenom blagostanju. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 63(1), 23-40. doi.org/10.5937/analipfb1501023b

Caselli, M., Fracasso, A., & Traverso, S. (2018). Globalization and Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from Italy. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3194705.

Cornia, G. A., & Martorano, B. (2012). Development policies and income inequality in selected developing regions, 1980–2010 (No. 210). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Available at: https://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/osgdp20124_en.pdf

Cowell, F. A., & Van Kerm, P. (2015). Wealth inequality: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(4), 671-710. doi.org/10.1111/joes.12114

Durlauf, S. N. (1996). A theory of persistent income inequality. Journal of Economic growth, 1(1), 75-93. doi.org/10.1007/bf00163343.

Erić, O. (2013). Factors of economic unevenness in theory and the European practice. Ekonomski vidici, 18(2-3), 287-300.

EUROSTAT, Statistics Database: Income inequality in countries in European Union, avaliable at: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di12&lang=en.

Galbraith, J. K., & Garcilazo, E. (2014). Unemployment, Inequality and the Policy of Europe: 1984- 2000. In empirical post Keynesian Economics (pp. 56-81), Routleddge. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/pslbnlaqr/2004_3a11.htm

García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., García-Castro, J. D., PalacioSañudo, J., Polo, J., & Rentería-Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of economic inequality in Colombian daily life: More than unequal distribution of economic resources. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1660. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660.

Greenwood, J., Guner, N., & Knowles, J. A. (2003). More on marriage, fertility, and the distribution of income. International Economic Review, 44(3), 827-862. doi.org/10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00091.

Jäntti, M., Sierminska, E. M., & Van Kerm, P. (2015). Modeling the joint distribution of income and wealth. In Measurement of Poverty, Deprivation, and Economic Mobility (pp. 301-327). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi.org/10.1108/s1049-258520150000023010.

Jovanović Gavrilović, B. (2003). Nejednakost i razvoj. Economic Annals 44(159), 21-61.doi.org/10.2298/eka0359021j.

Kuypers, S., & Marx, I. (2019). The truly vulnerable: integrating wealth into the measurement of poverty and social policy effectiveness. Social Indicators Research, 142(1), 131-147. doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1911

Leković, V. (2015). DETERMINANTE EKONOMSKE (NE) JEDNAKOSTI I NJENE IMPLIKACIJE ZA ODRŽIVI EKONOMSKI RAZVOJ. doi.org/10.5937/ekonhor1502081l

Milanović, B. (2016). Globalna nejednakost: Novi pristup za doba globalizacije. Akademska knjiga.

Molnar, D. (2013). Dinamika i struktura regionalnih dispariteta u Srbiji tokom perioda 2001-2010. godina’. Ekonomski vidici, 18(2-3), 175-189. https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:8334/bdef:Content/get

Molnar, D. (2013). Regionalne nejednakosti i privredni rast: primer Srbije (Doctoral dissertation, Универзитет у Београду, Економски факултет). https://fedorabg.bg.ac.rs/fedora/get/o:8334/bdef:Content/get

Nikiforos, M. (2016). Distribution-led growth in the long run. Review of Keynesian Economics, 4(4), 391-408. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2491094.

Piketty, T. (2015). Kapital u XXI veku. Beograd: Akademska knjiga. doi.org/10.22182/spm.4932015.13

Popović, G. (2009). Ekonomija Evropske unije: makroekonomski aspekti i zajedničke politike. Banja Luka: Ekonomski fakultet.

Rieder, M., & Theine, H. (2019). ‘Piketty is a genius, but…’: an analysis of journalistic delegitimation of Thomas Piketty’s economic policy proposals. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(3), 248-263. doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1573148

Šimurina, N., & Barbić, D. (2017). Porezne promjene i dohodovne nejednakosti u Europskoj uniji tijekom financijske krize. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 24(2), 123-142. doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1573148.

Šućur, Z. (2001). Siromaštvo: teorije, koncepti i pokazatelji. Pravni fakultet. doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v8i3.208

Törmälehto, V. M., Kannas, O., & Säylä, M. (2013). Integrated measurement of household-level income, wealth and non-monetary well-being in Finland. Statistics Finland working paper. http://www.stat.fi/tup/julkaisut/tiedostot/julkaisuluettelo/ywrp1_201300_2013_10518_net.pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Section

Review Scientific Paper

How to Cite

ECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN EUROPEAN UNION. (2019). Acta Economica, 17(31), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE1931107S

Similar Articles

21-30 of 148

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.