THE OPEN BALKAN AS A DEVELOPMENT DETERMINANT OF THE WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE2236031RKeywords:
development indicators, global indices, economic integration, Open Balkan, Western Balkans, EUAbstract
The paper starts from the concept of the Open Balkan as a community of countries in the Western Balkans, aimed at strengthening their economic cooperation and development for faster integration in the European Union. Significant attention is paid to the analysis of the interdependence of (in)stability of the state and the economic development of small countries. The position of the Open Balkan and its members is also analysed on the basis of the selected global composite indices. An important subject of the analysis is also the condition of institutional capacities of the members of the Open Balkan and their institutional cooperation from the perspective of faster progress towards the European integration. Two main hypotheses have been tested in the paper: (H1) CEEs countries are not a homogeneous group of countries; and (H2) The Western Balkans is a relatively homogeneous regional integration. To test the convergence hypothesis between 16 Central and Eastern European countries (CEEs), annual data from World Bank’s database on the value of real gross domestic product per capita (in constant dollars 2017, PPP) in the period 2000-2026 were used (projected values for the period until 2026). We employed the method developed by Phillips & Sul (2007) that allows identification of clusters of convergence on the basis of an algorithm that is data-driven and thereby avoids a priori classification of the data into subgroups. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that Serbia is the “locomotive” of the Western Balkans and that all countries in this area should join the regional initiative for cooperation, the Open Balkan.
References
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). Technological Diffusion, Convergence, and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth,2(1), 1-26. DOI:10.1023/A:1009746629269
Baumol, W. J. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: what the long-run data show. American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085. Retrieved from: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%2819861 ... O%3B2-B&origin=repec
Bernard, A. B., & Durlauf, S. N. (1995). Convergence in international output. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(2), 97-108. DOI: 10.3386/w3717
Doing Business. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.doingbusiness.org/en/custom-query
Doing Business. (2019). Retrieved from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings?region=europe-and-central-asia
Doing Business. (2019a). Ease of doing business score and ease of doing business ranking. Retrieved from: http://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB19-Chapters/DB19-Score-and-DBRankings.pdf
European Commission. (2021). Kosovo. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/enlargement-policy/negotiations-status/kosovo_hr
European Commission. (2021a). North Macedonia. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/enlargement-policy/negotiations-status/northmacedonia_en
European Commission. (2021b). Albania. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/enlargement-policy/negotiations-status/albania_en
Felbermayr, G., Gröschl, J., & Steinwachs, T. (2018). The trade effects of border controls: Evidence from the European Schengen Agreement. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 335-351. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12603
Freedom House. (2022). Countries and Territories. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/countries/nations-transit/scores
Freedom House. (2022a). Nations and Transit. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit
Griessler, C. (2020). The Berlin Process. Bringing the Western Balkan Region Closer to the European Union. Südosteuropa, 68(1), 1-24. DOI: 10.1515/soeu-2020-0001
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2008). Global Peace Index 2008: Methodology, results & findings, Sydney. Retrieved from: https://www.vredesmuseum.nl/download/vredesindex2008.pdf
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2017). Global Peace Index 2017: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-peace-index-2017
Institute for Economics and Peace. (2018). Global Peace Index 2018: Measuring Peace in a Complex World, Sydney. Retrieved from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports
Institute for Economics and Peace (2021). Global Peace Index 2021: Measuring Peace in a Complex World. Sydney. Retrieved from: http://visionofhumanity.org/reports
Kajánek, T. (2022). The power of small EU member states after Brexit: how powerful is the Visegrad Group?. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(1), 170-191. DOI: 10.47305/JLIA2281170k
Korauš, A., Mazák, M., & Dobrovič, J. (2018). Quantitative analysis of the competitiveness of Benelux countries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(4), 1069-1083. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4(26)
Ministarstvo za evropske integracije Republike Srbije. (2021). Istorijat odnosa Srbije i EU. Retrieved from: https://www.mei.gov.rs/srl/srbija-i-eu/istorijat-odnosasrbije-i-eu/
Molnar, D., & Jandrić, M. (2019). Unutarregionalne nejednakosti u Srbiji – testiranje klupske konvergencije. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke / Matica Srpska Social Sciences Quarterly LXX, 169(1), 91–108. DOI: 10.2298/ZMSDN1969091M
Musiał, K., & Šime, Z. (2021). How to build the legitimacy of regional integration on rational foundations: a case of epistemic communities in the Baltic Sea area. Journal of Baltic Studies, 52(4), 483-501. doi: 10.1080/01629778.2021.1964995
Parlamentarna skupština Bosne i Hercegovine. (2021). Ključni događaji u odnosima EU i Bosne i Hercegovine. Retrieved from: https://www.parlament.ba/Content/Read/126?title=Klju%C4%8Dni-doga%C4%91aji-u-odnosima-EU-i-Bosne-iHercegovine
Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771-1855. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00811.x
Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2009). Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1153-1185. DOI: 10.1002/jae.1080
Rikalović, G., Molnar, D., & Josipović, S. (2019). Makroekonomski učinci mira: koncept i merenje. U: S. Grk & D. Molnar (Ured.), Svet i Srbija – ekonomska i društvena gibanja (str. 59-78). Belgrade: CID Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade,
Rikalović, G., Molnar, D., & Josipović, S. (2021). Mini Šengen i izazovi evropskih integracija. U: S. Vujović (Ur.), EKOM 2021 Značaj Mini Šengena za evrointegracije Zapadnog Balkana (str. 12-39). Kosovska Mitrovica: Ekonomski fakultet, Univerzitet u Prištini sa privremenim sedištem u Kosovskoj Mitrovici. ISBN 978-86-80127-99-6
Skupština Crne Gore. (2021). Crna Gora i Evropska Unija. Retrieved from: https://zakoni.skupstina.me/25saziv/index.php/me/pristupanje-eu/crna-gora-i-eu
Stie, A. E. & Trondal, J. (2020). Introducing the study of Nordic cooperation. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 332-341. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3726
Tanasković, S. (2018). Dometi i ograničenja rangiranja Srbije prema različitim indeksima poslovnog okruženja. Kvartalni monitor, 54, 53-62.
Transparency International. (2018). Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption perceptions index. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl
Transparency International. (2021). Global corruption barometar. Retrieved from: https://www.transparency.org/en/gcb
World Bank. (2019). Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved from: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home
World Bank. (2021). World Bank database. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
