The Importance and Opportunities of Autonomous Industrial Policy Management in the Context of European Integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE1726221MKeywords:
industrial policy, state aid, competition, competitive advantageAbstract
After a long period in which industrial policy was in a kind of scientific exile, it is once again in the center of interest both to the academic and general public. The last crisis, due to the nature of the causes that led to it, paved the way for the return to the concept of industrial policy in developed countries, significantly changing the angle of observing the e?ectiveness of its application in stimulating economic growth. Along with this process in developed countries, developing countries, especially those with a failed transition, have faced the need to change the existing growth models. A model based on consumption and import has exhausted its potential from the point of its impact on the current economic trends, while in a longer period of time its unsustainability has become more than obvious. The affirmation of a new model based on investment and export presupposes the necessary process of reindustrialization. In this respect, there is a dilemma in what form and in what way it is possible to apply an industrial policy that would be e?ected through the renewal of the production base.
References
UNIDO. (2015). Competitive Industrial Performance Report 2014. Working paper 12/2014. Vienna: UNIDO.
Council of the European Union. (2005). The Economic Costs of Non-Lisbon, A survey of the literature on the economic impact of Lisbon-type reforms, Commission Staff Working Document, Commission of the European Communities. Brussels.
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: Commission proposes new economic strategy – 03.03.2010. Brussels: European Council, “Council Conclusions”.
EUROSTAT: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/expenditure.html
Kesner–Škreb, M. (2011). Industrial Policy and State Aid in Croatia. Newsletter, An Occasional Publication of Institute of Public Finance, 55, pp. 1–7.
Europska komisija. (2014). Komunikacija komisije europskom parlamentu, vijeću, gospodarskom i socijalnom odboru i odboru regija зa europsku industrijsku renesansu Bruxelles: 22.1.2014.COM(2014) 14 final.
Pack, H. and Saggi, K. (2006). Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. The World Bank Research Observer,21(2), pp. 267–97.
Reiner, C. (2012). Play it again, Sam: die Renaissance der Industriepolitik in der Großen Rezession’.Wirtschafund Gesellschaf, 38(1), pp. 15-56.
Stöllinger, R., Foster-McGregor, N., Holzner, M., et.al. (2013). A ‘Manufacturing Imperative’ in the EU –Europe’s Position in Global Manufacturing and the Role of Industrial Policy. Vienna: WiiW.
Stojanović, B., Stanišić, T. (2015). Sektorska državna pomoć u Evropskoj uniji i nekim zemljama Zapadnog Balkana, Ekonomske teme, 53 (3), str. 335-347.
THE ECONOMIST. (2010). Industrial policy: Tis House believe that industrial policy always fails, “Economist Debates”, July (www.economist.com).
European Commission. (2014). Towards an Industrial Renaissance, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/policy/renaissance_en.
Vujović, D. (2012). Nova industrijska politika - slalom između Scile tržišta Haribde državne intervencije. Ekonomika preduzeća, 60(1-2), str. 63-77.
Warwick K. (2013). Beyond industrial policy: Emerging issues and new trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Paper No. 2. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Paris.
Wishlade, F.G. (2008). Competition and Cohesion – Coherence or Conflict? European Union Regional State Aid Reform Post-2006. Regional Studies, 42 (5), pp. 753–765.
Wishlade, G. F., Michie, M. (2009). Pandora’s Box and the Delphic Oracle: EU Cohesion Policy and State Aid Complianc. IQ-Net Thematic paper, 24(2).
Дирекција за економско планирање. (2015). Информација о конкурентности економије БиХ. Сарајево: ДЕП.
