EXTERNAL ADJUSTMENT AND FLEXIBILITY OF THE EXCHANGE RATE REGIME: THE CASE OF TRANSITION COUNTRIES

Dragan  Gligorić; Borce  Trenovski; Kristijan  Kozheski

doi:10.7251/ACE2134009G

Authors

Dragan Gligorić University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Economics, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-8699
Borce Trenovski SS. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics, Skopje, Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3630-9486
Kristijan Kozheski SS. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics, Skopje, Macedonia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8182-1219

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7251/ACE2134009G

Keywords:

exchange rate regime, external adjustment, transition countries, first order autoregression

Abstract

Milton Friedman’s traditional claim is that flexible exchange rates facilitate external adjustment by means of their corrective movements before the balance of payments crisis occurs. In order to test this hypothesis, we employ the first order autoregression based on the panel data on exchange rate regime and external balance expressed as the share of balance of goods and services in GDP. The sample covers 16 Central and Eastern European (CEE) and 12 Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) transition countries over the period 2000-2019. The results, which are based on the sample of all transition countries, failed to prove that more flexible exchange rate regimes facilitate external adjustment. When the analysis was performed on two groups of countries separately, the results showed that the deficit of balance of goods and services in CIS countries has a higher persistence compared to CEE countries. However, a more flexible exchange rate regime does not facilitate external adjustment. On the other hand, in CEE countries, the relationship between exchange rate regime flexibility and the rate of balance of goods and services reversion exists, proving that Friedman’s hypothesis does hold.

References

Bubula A. & Ötker- Robe, I.(2002). The evolution of exchange rate regimes since 1990: evidence from de facto policies. IMF Working Paper, WP/02/155. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2002/wp02155.pdf

Chinn, M. D. & Wei, S-J.(2008). A Faith-Based Initiative Meets The Evidence: Does a Flexible Exchange Rate Regime Really Facilitate Current Account Adjustment? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1),168–184. doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00244

Clower, E. & Ito, H. (2012). The Persistence of Current Account Balances and its Determinants: The Implications for Global Rebalancing. ADBI Working Papers 400. Asian Development Bank Institute. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/156255/adbi-wp400.pdf

Combes, J-L., Kinda, T.& Plane, P. (2011). Capital Flows, Exchange Rate Flexibility, and the Real Exchange Rate. Journal of macroeconomics, 34(4), 1034-1043. doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.08.001

Domaç, I., Peters, K.& YuzefovichY.(2001). Does the Exchange Rate Regime affect Macroeconomic Performance. Policy Research Working Papers Series 2642. The World Bank. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/2642.html

Eguren-Martín, F. (2016). Exchange rate regimes and current account adjustment: an empirical investigation. Journal of International Money and Finance, 65, 69-93. doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.03.006

Ghosh, A., Qureshi, M. & Tsangarides, C. (2014). Friedman Redux: External Adjustment and Exchange Rate Flexibility. Working Paper, WP/14/146. IMF. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/31/Friedman-ReduxExternal-Adjustment-and-Exchange-Rate-Flexibility-41836

Ghosh, A., Terrones, M.E. & Zettelmeyer, J. (2008). Exchange Rate Regimes and External Adjustment: New Answers to an Old Debate. In C. Wyplosz (ed.), The New International Monetary System: Essays in Honor of Alexander Swoboda. London, UK: Routledge. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1969998

Herrmann, S. (2009). Do we really know that flexible exchange rates facilitate current account adjustment? Some new empirical evidence for CEE countries. Discussion Paper Series 1, Economic Studies, 22/2009. Deutsche Bundesbank. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/bubdp1/200922.html

IMF. (2020).Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and Exchange Restrictions. Washington. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Annual-Report-onExchange-Arrangements-and-Exchange-Restrictions/Issues/2020/08/10/AnnualReport-on-Exchange-Arrangements-and-Exchange-Restrictions-2019-47102

IMF. (2021). AREAER ONLINE. Retrieved form: https://www.elibrary-areaer.imf.org/

Levy-Yeyati E.& Sturzenegger, F. (2002). Classifying Exchange Rate Regimes: Deeds vs. Words. European Economic Review, 49(6), 1603-1635. doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.01.001

Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2003a). A de facto Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes: A Methodological Note, unpublished manuscript. Retrieved form https://fsturzenegger.com.ar/pdf/A-de-facto-Classification-of-Exchange-RateRegimes1.pdf.

Levy-Yeyati, E., & Sturzenegger, F. (2003b). To Float or to Fix: Evidence on the Impact of Exchange Rate Regimes on Growth. American Economic Review, 93, 1173–1193. DOI: 10.1257/000282803769206250

Reinhart, C.M. & Rogoff, K. (2004). The Modern History of Exchange Rate Arrangements: A Reinterpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 (1), 1-48. DOI 10.3386/w8963

Sachs, J. (1996). Economic Transition and the Exchange-Rate Regime. American Economic Review, 86(2), 147-152. Retrieved from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118113?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1

Tippkötter, M. (2010). Global Imbalances and the Current Account Adjustment Process: An Empirical Analysis. DIW Discussion Paper, 1011. Retrieved from: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.357637.de/dp1011.pdf

World Bank. (2021). World Development Indicators. Retrieved form: https://databank.worldbank.org/home.aspx.

Zarković,V., Gligorić, D. & Tešić, J. (2012). Exchange Rate Regimes and Real Exchange Rate in the Western Balkan Countries. Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference “Economics Business Management 2012”, Kragujevac, Serbia.

Beker-Pucar, Е. (2010). Upravljano fluktuiranje deviznog kursa u režimu inflacionog targetiranja u tranzicionim ekonomijama sa osvrtom na Srbiju. Doctoral dissertation. Subotica; Serbia: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economic Subotica.

Vujanić, V., Žarković, V. & Gligorić, D. (2017). The Impact of Applied Exchange Rate Regimes on the External Balance of European Transition countries. Svarog, 15, 150-167. doi.org/10.7251/SVR1715150V

Dragutinovic, D. (2008). Moć i nemoć monetarne politike u uspostavljanju ravnoteže između platnobilansnih ciljeva i ciljeva inflacije. Radne Studije. Beograd, Srbija: Narodna Banka Srbije. Retrieved from: https://nbs.rs/export/sites/NBS_site/documents/publikacije/strucni-radovi/2008_12_DD.pdf

Кeller, P.M. & Richardson, M. (2003). Nominal Anchors in the CIS. IMF working paper, WP/07/179. Retrieved from: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/Nominal-Anchors-in-the-CIS-16784